Smoking Times Four

I’m not a smoker, but I’d say one of the neat things about having this habit is how long you can extend a cigarette’s usage – a single cigarette can actually be enjoyed multiple times, and by numerous people.  Sure, the best part of the smoke would be the initial user’s inhalation of the cigarette, but as long as the exhaled second-hand smoke remains in the air, there is still an opportunity for the smoker and all other bystanders to partake, and make use of that cigarette’s contents.

I would have thought that this would be the end of it, but a study has indicated that a cigarette can potentially be enjoyed even after the lingering smoke has dissipated.  This study has come up with the concept of “third-hand smoke” to describe the remnants from a cigarette’s smoke left behind on the surface of furniture, car seats, rugs, pets, clothes, and other materials long after the cigarette has been extinguished.  Although the study (actually, more of a telephone survey) did not actually involve taking samples of surfaces and dust in a smokers’ homes (which, without empirical results, would understandably make some question the theory), but according to the experts, one can delight in a cigarette long after the last puff by touching some surfaces.

As well, there appears to be evidence in a study published a couple of days ago that the third-hand smoke surface residue could theoretically react with certain substances in the air to form new and active compounds.  Should this then be considered fourth-hand smoke?  Compared to one-time only consumables like chocolate or Fresca, it seems that cigarettes just keep on giving, even when unlit.  Now that we are becoming aware how far they can go, the question becomes (especially for those on a budget), if someone remains in an enclosed space, could fewer cigarettes thus provide all the nutrients one needs for the day?

Explore posts in the same categories: Healthy Living

4 Comments on “Smoking Times Four”

  1. Ros Says:

    Seems to me puzzling from your sentence ‘according to the experts’ who the smoking expert might be? Could you please answer it honestly?!

  2. Snowdon Says:

    ‘Theoretical’ is the word. Unless you’re planning on filling your house with nitrous acid, there’s not much to worry about.

    http://velvetgloveironfist.blogspot.com/2010/02/thirdhand-smoke-scam.html

    CJ Snowdon

  3. Eva Says:

    Everything is lingering…resentments, cigarette smoke, diesel fumes, photons from the Sun, life, curses, taste of lemon… methinks that humans have bigger problems, than thinking up some more.

  4. Firla Says:

    Well, the fourth-hand smoke study noted above comes from the University of California’s Tobacco-Related Disease Research Program. Seems fairly large based on its website: http://www.trdrp.org/ ($393.4M in grants shown)… one would suggest that we already know quite well the major proven issues with tobacco smoking which may affect our health (namely first and second-hand smoke), so leave it to science-major busybodies to come up with more contrived issues when lots of research money is available.

    Good thoughts and article from Snowdon – exposing cigarette residue to nitrous acid to make instant carcinogens definitely did read like it was a bit of a stretch.

    Not sure if I fully understand that list of things that linger, which combined both the concrete and the abstract. But we do know that one’s health is definitely connected with some of them.

Comment: